email oddness, does this look correct?

long story short, something does not feel right about this address. anyone see anything fishy that i dont??





Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0

Received: from web41107.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.23]) by westphoto_dc1.westphoto.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);

&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Mon, 4 Aug 2003 13:10:10 -0500

Message-ID: <20030804180738.13340.qmail@web41107.mail.yahoo.com>

Received: from [66.46.129.174] by web41107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:07:38 PDT

Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT)

From: pp pp <adam_brickell@yahoo.com>

Subject: RE: eBay Item: Sweet Sinar Original 4x5 P View Camera w/ext (Item #2942302953)

To: Aaron Uban <AaronU@westphoto.com>

In-Reply-To: <27BDE50D3E83904B8E084727DA68DE45177002@WESTPHOTO_d c1>

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Return-Path: adam_brickell@yahoo.com

X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2003 18:10:10.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4D3DDE0:01C35AB3]




</p>

[Estral LC]

Yes - it's a solid header. Welcome to MS SMTP Services. /gag



I swear, most of the time I can see why MS does things the way they do. I can usually look at something MS and go, "Well, I sure as shit wouldn't have done it that way but it kinda works..."



Yet every now and then they fly off the rafters like a hairy litte monkey and pull something out of their hat that just blows me away. Why on earth anyone would convert a mail username to UUEncode-16 hex is just fooking out there. After all, you can only do that for internal routing anyways, so what's the point? lol



Again, it is a properly formatted email header, but in the same way that a 3-legged frog is still called a frog.


</p>

[Damudge Deeler]

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Microsoft<hr></blockquote>



^^^^^Always Fishy^^^^^


<a href=http://www.magelo.com/eq_view_profile.html?num=19594> Me </a></p>